![]() But because White has bishop pair, I think I will go for a draw after 10.dxc4, as stated by Loomis. Here Black has 2 pawns for a piece but White risks an inferior ending due to the bad pawn formation, and the exposed king to take care so White cannot plan an attack but surrender to Black's plan to exchange and transform to suitable endgame. If only White doesn't have the bishop pair, I think I will prefer 10.dxc4 as "suggested" by the computer. The pin works because White cannot chase the bishop with h3 and g4 because that will sacrifice his king's safety. dxe4 which will give a positionally good position for Black imo. Bd4 if White ever takes the knight on b4. I think KID short-term analysis also tends to give too big plus for White.īTW, I think I prefer 10.Bg4 pinning the knight to the queen. I have heard that you "cannot" (to certain extent of course) rely on computer to analyze Ruy Lopez positions because often White gets a minus sign from the computer when from best practice we know that the position will eventually gets to White's favor. Some complex (usually tactical) positions just have so many possibilities that it will take more time than usual for the computer to get to a reliable depth, hence reliable result. Usually there's a certain depth where computer calculation can be considered accurate enough. ![]() The longer the time, the deeper the calculation and the more accurate it gets. ![]() Computer accuracy depends on time or depth. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |